This style named after the Greek god of loveand the son of Aphroditeis characterized by relentless romance and passion, and often falls in "love at first sight. Additionally, these individuals seek out their "ideal type.
An Analysis Abstract This is an analysis of how the six love styles pertain to sexual styles, personality, and relational satisfaction.
The research explains a positive relationship between relational and sexual satisfaction with certain love styles and that love styles can change over time, since love is learned. The studies also show relational satisfaction with couples who have the same or similar love styles proving the rule of proximity and homogeny.
This analysis will show love styles, sex, and personality are inextricably linked along with communication in order to have a satisfying relationship.
Self Report Measures for Love and Compassion Research: Different Types of Love LOVE ATTITUDES SCALE Reference: Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. (). A theory and method of love. limerence, loving, love addiction, and love styles were administered to undergraduates. Attachment style was related in theoretically expected ways to attachment. "Six love style scales emerged clearly from factor analysis" in both studies. What six different types of love did J. A. Lee define? Hendrick and Hendrick () produced a Love Attitude Scale to detect the six varieties of love through questionnaire responses. The Love Style Quiz Each person’s childhood experiences form the roots of who they are; continuing to inform the way that person responds to others or expresses love, even far into adulthood. The result of all these experiences are actually very predictable because people tend to fall into one of five special categories: called “Love Styles”.
People have been known to lie, cheat, steal, and even kill in its name, yet no one knows quite what it is Arnold,pg. Humans are loving and sexual beings; they are both primitive functions of humanity.
This also leads to relational satisfaction and which love styles would prove to be the most rewarding to a couple.
This analysis can also give insight into how people view their own relationships and how it relates to love styles, sexual styles and satisfaction. The love styles can also be linked to sexual styles. Main In Dating Partner Preferences Hahn, the authors say that people are attracted to others with the same or similar love style as themselves.
And, they are also repelled by those who have dissimilar love styles. This follows the rule of proximity. This finding was unexpected; it was hypothesized that erotic stimulus people would he the most consensually desired.
Gender was also a consideration because of the Hendrick and Hendrick theory that men have a greater tendency to report the ludus style and women are more likely to report storge as a love style. Although the study found women actually also exhibit eros more often and express a greater propensity to choose a more attractive partner than previously hypothesized.
In Love Style Perceptions in Relation to Personality Function by Arnold and Thompsonthat love styles do not predict personality disorders on the basis of which style the person employs. The study also could not find significance in being able to predict certain love styles.
There is a greater chance of ludus, no matter the gender, between young single adults. Eros is also more common among the young, but not exclusive. The study found that men and women with families would tend to value storge and pragma until the children were grown and out of the house.
This study surveyed men and woman of all ages, both married and single. The researchers wanted the most diverse data set possible to support the hypothesis that love styles change throughout the course of a lifespan.
According to the study, the simple answer to his question is yes. There was a positive correlation between eros and sexual role playing with women, but the same was not founded for men. The opposite is true for storge.
The study reported that there is a positive correlation between men and sexual trance, but not for females. This is because mania involves being with only one lover, with storge there is already a close and bonded friendship, and agapic lovers are selfless in their relationships, which generally takes time to develop.
The study also found when these characteristics are present they do not lead to relational satisfaction. Instead, the study found that couples may seek to continue the relationship on the comparison level of alternatives and the level of investment in the relationship.
It also confirmed the other three styles are more consistent with relational satisfaction. Waller and Shaver did a twin-family study to study the nongenetic influences on romantic love styles.
The study found that love styles are not an inherited trait, but are due to shared experiences, environment, and personality. While the environment could lend them toward one love style, it is not inherited and can be influenced by other factors giving the opportunity for greater relational satisfaction.
Of the six love styles, ludus is the only style that, on its own merit, does not relate to relational satisfaction. In small doses, it can be satisfying, but not as a dominant trait in a relationship.
It is also the most independent of the styles because of the need to stay detached while game-playing. It has the least amount of disclosure Arnold, In contrast, this love style can be satisfying when compared with sexual styles in relationships Frey, Hendrick also related love styles to sexual attitudes with permissiveness or casual sex, responsible sexuality, idealistic sexuality, and biological sexuality.
Hendrick then related this to three factors. The first factor includes game playing love and can be characterized as casual relating.
Factor two includes erotic, altruistic, and manic love along with idealistic sexuality and can be characterized as intimate relating. Factor three includes practical and friendship love and can be characterized as stable relating.
Wood states there are a number of things to keep in mind when it comes to love styles:Sep 17, · Kristin details the s theory of Love Styles by John Lee.
A blog about love, relationships, and dating with a Lebanese twist. The purpose of this blog is not to give advice, but rather to connect relationship research, life anecdotes, experiences, and resources to you in a convenient way that can help understand who we love, why we love them, what we look for in a partner, and how we can create better, stronger, and more meaningful relationships.
Abstract. This is an analysis of how the six love styles pertain to sexual styles, personality, and relational satisfaction. The research explains a positive relationship between relational and sexual satisfaction with certain love styles and that love styles can change over time, since love is learned.
Oct 15, · The six love styles was originally developed by John Lee (, ), he referred to these love styles as "colors of love", and also wrote a book on this schwenkreis.coms: 6.
The Experience of "Being In Love" Is Not The Same For Everyone Not everyone experiences love in exactly the same manner. Research has shown that love comes in several different forms or styles (see Lee .
The Love Style Quiz Each person’s childhood experiences form the roots of who they are; continuing to inform the way that person responds to others or expresses love, even far into adulthood. The result of all these experiences are actually very predictable because people tend to fall into one of five special categories: called “Love Styles”.