A study of colin radford paradox of fiction

Event 20 April 18h00 at the Institute of Digital Games - University of Malta Game Lectures are held approximately once a month at the IDG and are public, open, free events on weekday evenings which bring together academics, practitioners and enthusiasts with a common love for games of any type: How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina?

A study of colin radford paradox of fiction

Full citation Abstract If feeling a genuine emotion requires believing that its object actually exists, and if this is a belief we are unlikely to have about fictional entities, then how could we feel genuine emotions towards these entities?

Puzzles and Paradoxes of Imagination and the Arts

This question lies at the core of the paradox of fiction. Since its original formulation, this paradox has generated a substantial literature. Until recently, the dominant strategy had consisted in trying to solve it.

Yet, it is more and more frequent for scholars to try to dismiss it using data and theories coming from psychology.

What Would Dutton Say about the Paradox of Fiction | David Kyle Johnson - schwenkreis.com

In opposition to this trend, the present paper argues that the paradox of fiction cannot be dissolved in the ways recommended by the recent literature. We start by showing how contemporary attempts at dissolving the paradox assume that it emerges from theoretical commitments regarding the nature of emotions.

Next, we argue that the paradox of fiction rather emerges from everyday observations, the validity of which is independent from any such commitment.

This is why we then go on to claim that a mere appeal to psychology in order to discredit these theoretical commitments cannot dissolve the paradox. We bring our discussion to a close on a more positive note, by exploring how the paradox could in fact be solved by an adequate theory of the emotions Topics: · Next, we argue that the paradox of fiction rather emerges from everyday observations, the validity of which is independent from any such commitment.

Project MUSE - The Paradox of Fiction and the Ethics of Empathy: Reconceiving Dickens's Realism

This is why we then go on to claim that a mere appeal to psychology in order to discredit these theoretical commitments cannot dissolve the schwenkreis.com://schwenkreis.com  · Transcript of Paradox of Fiction.

Paradox of Fiction The Paradox 1). To have real emotional responses we must believe that the people and situations in question really do exist or did exist at one time 2).

When we engage with fictional texts we do not believe that the events or characters really do exist or did exist Radford, Colin. "How schwenkreis.com Actor: He was a member of the Moray Youth Theatre.

A study of colin radford paradox of fiction

Imagining: A Phenomenological Study. as well as a study of colin radford paradox of fiction fantasy. · The Fiction of Paradox quasi-fear, quasi-pity and so on, towards them.3 And by this, Walton means that we merely imagine ourselves afraid or sad as part of a game of make- believe4 in which the story is a prop.

Walton compares readers and viewers of fiction to children who play at being afraid, say, when their father, acting as a monster, runs after schwenkreis.com://schwenkreis.com  · If Colin Radford contends that emotional responses to non-real events are irrational, constituting a paradox of fiction, then surely Radford would also have to conclude that it is “illogical, irrational, even incoherent” that a human can experience emotional responses to schwenkreis.com The usual reply to Radford’s argument is to deny that we are, in fact, 7 committed to all three claims in the Paradox of Fiction.

A study of colin radford paradox of fiction

Since the incoherence is supposed to stem from our commitment to these three inconsistent claims, this would avoid the .

Fiction, Pleasurable Tragedy, and the HOT Theory of Consciousness | Gennaro | Philosophical Papers